Comparison

SIF vs PMS — Specialised Investment Funds vs Portfolio Management Services

Both sit above ordinary mutual funds in ticket size and strategy flexibility, but they're structured very differently — and that difference affects your entry amount, taxation, and even whose name the underlying securities sit in. Here's a factual, side-by-side comparison, sourced to SEBI's current regulations for each.

The Core Structural Difference

SIF (Specialised Investment Fund): a SEBI-regulated category launched within an existing mutual fund AMC's framework. You buy units in a pooled scheme — the same basic structure as a mutual fund, just with wider strategy freedom (limited short positions via derivatives, higher single-issuer exposure limits) than a regular mutual fund is allowed.

PMS (Portfolio Management Service): a SEBI-licensed portfolio manager runs a portfolio of individual securities directly in your own demat account — you personally own the underlying shares, not units in a pooled vehicle. Two clients in the same PMS strategy can technically end up holding slightly different stocks or quantities depending on when they joined.

Side-by-Side Comparison

ParameterSIFPMS
Minimum Investment₹10 lakh per PAN, across all SIF strategies at one AMC (not per scheme) — waived entirely for SEBI-accredited investors₹50 lakh per client, must generally be maintained even after partial withdrawal
Regulatory FrameworkSEBI SIF framework (Dec 2024 circular, effective framework from Feb 2025), operating under mutual fund regulationsSEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 2020
Ownership of SecuritiesPooled — you hold units in the scheme, like a mutual fundDirect — securities sit in your own demat account in your name
Structure OptionsOpen-ended, close-ended, or interval, depending on the strategyDiscretionary (manager decides) or Non-Discretionary (you approve each trade)
DistributionCan be distributed by AMFI-registered Mutual Fund DistributorsRequires a separate SEBI-registered Portfolio Manager relationship — distributors typically cannot sell PMS the way they sell mutual funds/SIFs
TaxationTaxed at the fund level like a mutual fund — LTCG/STCG rules for equity-oriented SIFs, debt-fund taxation rules for debt-oriented onesTaxed on your own trades — every buy/sell in your PMS portfolio is a taxable event for you personally, reported on your own capital gains statement
Fee StructureExpense ratio charged at the scheme level, capped like mutual fund fee normsTypically a management fee plus, often, a performance fee (e.g. a share of profits above a hurdle rate) — varies by portfolio manager
TransparencyNAV published, holdings disclosed periodically like a mutual fund schemeYou can see your own exact holdings in real time (it's your demat account) — but performance isn't standardised/published the way scheme NAVs are
PortabilityRedeem and reinvest elsewhere — standard mutual-fund-style liquidity, subject to the specific scheme's structureDirect securities can sometimes be transferred in-kind to another PMS provider without a full sale, depending on the arrangement

Note on Direct Plan taxation: LTCG/STCG treatment applies per the tax rules for the SIF's specific category (equity-oriented, debt-oriented, or hybrid) — confirm exact current rates with a tax advisor before investing.

A Reform in Progress, Worth Knowing About

SEBI has floated a consultation paper (July 2026) proposing a new, separate "Mutual Fund-only PMS" category with a lower ₹25 lakh entry threshold — specifically for portfolios that invest only in mutual fund schemes, ETFs, and SIFs, rather than individual stocks. This is a proposal under consultation, not yet a finalised rule — the ₹50 lakh threshold for traditional (direct-equity) PMS remains in effect as of today. Worth watching if it's finalised, since it would meaningfully change where the SIF-vs-PMS entry-ticket gap sits.

Which Tends to Suit Which Situation

This isn't a recommendation — it's a description of how each structure is generally used:

  • SIF tends to suit investors who want mutual-fund-style pooled simplicity (one NAV, standard redemption process, fund-level tax treatment) but want access to strategies — like limited short positions — that ordinary mutual funds aren't permitted to run.
  • PMS tends to suit investors who specifically want to own individual securities directly in their own name, are comfortable managing their own trade-level tax reporting, and have the ₹50 lakh minimum to commit to a single relationship.

Explore SIF Options

If a SIF's structure fits what you're looking for, you can explore every live SIF strategy currently available — real AMFI-sourced NAV, returns, and scheme details — on our SIF Intelligence Centre.

Explore the SIF Intelligence Centre →

See also: SIF vs AIF →

👋 New here? I'm the SIF AI Agent — ask me anything about SIFs, how to use this page, or Integrato. Instant answers, no waiting.