Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund
Edelweiss Mutual Fund · International FoF · Regular plan, growth option
| Period | Scheme | Category median | Asia & emerging markets median |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -2.9% | 0.0% | -0.9% |
| 3 months | -2.1% | 1.0% | -1.9% |
| 6 months | 12.9% | 15.1% | 18.2% |
| Year to date | 20.0% | 17.9% | 24.4% |
| 1 year | 20.3% | 22.8% | 25.3% |
| 3 years (CAGR) | 23.8% | 25.7% | 25.6% |
| 5 years (CAGR) | 5.3% | 12.2% | 10.7% |
| 7 years (CAGR) | 12.2% | 14.4% | 13.2% |
| 10 years (CAGR) | n/a | 11.7% | 11.1% |
| Since first NAV (CAGR) | 12.3% | – | – |
“Asia & emerging markets” is MFIC's grouping of International FoF schemes by the theme or index in their names, not an AMFI category.
| Measure | Scheme | Category median |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y rolling median | 14.0% | 12.1% |
| 3Y rolling median | 12.0% | 12.9% |
| 3Y rolling worst | -20.3% | -1.7% |
| 3Y periods positive | 73% | 99% |
| 3Y periods ahead of benchmark | n/a | n/a |
| 5Y rolling median | 4.8% | 8.5% |
| 5Y rolling worst | -2.1% | 1.6% |
| 5Y periods ahead of benchmark | n/a | n/a |
Benchmark: none available in MFIC's free data for this category.
| Measure | Scheme | Category median |
|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation (ann.) | 20.6% | 16.8% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.84 | 1.20 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.70 | 2.37 |
| Beta | n/a | n/a |
| Alpha (ann.) | n/a | n/a |
| Upside capture | n/a | n/a |
| Downside capture | n/a | n/a |
| Measure | Scheme | Category median |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum drawdown, full history | −55.1% | −28.1% |
| Maximum drawdown, last 10Y | n/a | −35.4% |
| Maximum drawdown, last 5Y | −45.3% | −28.0% |
| Current drawdown | −7.7% | −4.4% |
| Recovery time of worst fall | 1271 days | – |
Longer histories include more crises, so compare the 5Y and 10Y figures across schemes of different ages.
This scheme invests mainly in the markets below, which are also close to how many of them are benchmarked. Where those markets stand today:
- 1Y +0.1% · 3Y +19.7% p.a. · 5Y +7.8% p.a. (index fund NAV, after costs)
- −7.0% from its 52-week high (proxy NAV)
- 1Y +23.7% · 3Y +27.1% p.a. · 5Y +18.1% p.a. (index fund NAV, after costs)
- −0.8% from its 52-week high (proxy NAV)
- 1Y +33.7% · 3Y +33.9% p.a. · 5Y +21.9% p.a. (index fund NAV, after costs)
- At its 52-week high (proxy NAV)
Index levels and P/E: NSE daily index closing values; gold and silver: IBJA rates; returns: growth NAV of an index fund or ETF tracking the market (AMFI), so they are after that fund's costs. Context only: a market's level or valuation does not tell you how any scheme will perform. Explore all markets.
The Regular plan's expense ratio is 1.58% a year and the Direct plan's 0.75%, a gap of 0.83%; over the last 3 years the Direct plan returned 1.12 percentage points a year more. On a ₹25,000 monthly SIP for 20 years (illustration at 12% a year before costs) the gap adds up to about ₹19,84,724.
With the Regular plan, that cost pays a distributor to help you plan, choose and review funds, and stay invested when markets fall. Whether it is worth it depends on how much of that you will do yourself.
TER: AMFI TER disclosure. Returns: AMFI NAVs. Illustration, not a guaranteed saving or return.
| Fund manager | Role | Managing since |
|---|---|---|
| Bhavesh Jain | 27 Sep 2019 | |
| Bharat Lahoti | 1 Oct 2021 |
Documents: Scheme Information Document · Scheme Summary Document. Read the scheme documents before investing.
| Measure | Scheme | Category median |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio (TER), Regular plan | 1.58% | 1.37% |
| AUM, whole scheme (₹ crore) | 2,996 | 372 |
| Riskometer | Very High | – |
TER: AMFI, TER of MF Schemes. AUM and riskometer: AMFI, Fund Performance, 30 Sep 2026.
| Measure | Scheme | Benchmark / category |
|---|---|---|
| Month-ends above category median (3Y CAGR) | 41% | 55% median |
| Month-ends in category top quartile (3Y) | 37% | 20% median |
| 7Y rolling CAGR, median (monthly windows) | 7.2% | 7.6% median |
Official benchmark: MSCI Golden Dragon Index (total return index, as published by AMFI). Category consistency: last 10 years of month-ends, International FoF Regular plans; how it is calculated.
| Year | Scheme | Benchmark | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 YTD | 20.0% | n/a | – |
| 2025 | 37.9% | n/a | – |
| 2024 | 14.8% | n/a | – |
| 2023 | -10.3% | n/a | – |
| 2022 | -21.1% | n/a | – |
| 2021 | -8.6% | n/a | – |
| 2020 | 57.4% | n/a | – |
| 2019 | 45.7% | n/a | – |
| 2018 | -17.5% | n/a | – |
| 2017 | 43.6% | n/a | – |
No free benchmark proxy for this category. The first year starts from the first 31 December in the scheme's history.
| Period | Invested | Value | XIRR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | ₹1,20,000 | ₹1,33,562 | 18.6% |
| 3 years | ₹3,60,000 | ₹5,55,254 | 28.8% |
| 5 years | ₹6,00,000 | ₹9,41,157 | 17.5% |
Uses this plan's NAVs; ignores stamp duty, exit loads and taxes. One historical path only — the interactive SIP analyzer shows outcomes across every start date.
| Scheme | Category | Correlation | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund | International FoF | 0.97 | 21.9% |
| ICICI Prudential Global Advantage Fund (FOF) | Domestic FoF | 0.83 | 19.7% |
| HSBC Asia Pacific (Ex Japan) Dividend Yield Fund | International FoF | 0.82 | 27.4% |
| Edelweiss Emerging Markets Opportunities Equity Offshore Fund | International FoF | 0.81 | 28.8% |
| Kotak Global Emerging Market Overseas Equity Active FOF | International FoF | 0.80 | 26.9% |
| HSBC Global Emerging Markets Fund | International FoF | 0.79 | 28.6% |
- What is the latest NAV of Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund?
- The NAV of the Regular plan (growth option) was ₹63.0940 on 1 Oct 2026, as published by AMFI.
- Which category is Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund in?
- It is classified as International FoF in AMFI's daily NAV file. MFIC compares it with 55 International FoF schemes (Regular plans).
- What returns has Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund delivered?
- Over one year the NAV changed by 20.3%. The 3-year CAGR is 23.8% (category median 25.7%) and the 5-year CAGR is 5.3% (category median 12.2%). Returns are after expenses and before tax. Past performance may or may not be sustained in future.
- How consistent have its 3-year returns been?
- Measuring a 3-year CAGR from every business day in its history, the median was 12.0%, the lowest was -20.3%, and 73% of 3-year periods ended with a gain.
- What was the largest fall in Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund's NAV?
- The largest peak-to-trough fall in its available history was 55.1%; within the last five years it was 45.3% (category median 28.0%).
- How volatile is Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund?
- Its annualised standard deviation of monthly returns over the last 36 months is 20.6%, which is above the International FoF category median of 16.8%.
- What would a monthly SIP in Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund have grown to?
- A SIP of ₹10,000 on the first business day of each month for the last 5 years (60 instalments, ₹6,00,000 invested) would have been worth about ₹9,41,157 on 1 Oct 2026, an annualised return (XIRR) of 17.5%. This uses the Regular plan's NAVs, ignores taxes and exit loads, and past performance may or may not be sustained in future.
- What is the expense ratio (TER) of Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund?
- The total expense ratio of the Regular plan is 1.58% a year, as disclosed to AMFI (median of International FoF Regular plans: 1.37%). It is already deducted from the NAV, so every return shown is after expenses.
- How large is Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund?
- Assets under management of the whole scheme were ₹2,996 crore on 30 Sep 2026, as published by AMFI.
- What is the riskometer level of Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund?
- AMFI lists the scheme's riskometer as “Very High”, and its benchmark's as “Very High”. The riskometer is a label of potential risk set under SEBI rules, not a forecast.
- How often has Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund beaten its category?
- At 41% of the 82 month-ends compared over the last 10 years, its 3-year return was above the median of International FoF schemes (Regular plans); it was in the top quarter at 37% of them. A typical scheme would show about 50%.
- Who manages Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund?
- According to its Scheme Summary Document, Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund is managed by Bhavesh Jain (since 27 Sep 2019), Bharat Lahoti (since 1 Oct 2021).
- What is the exit load of Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund?
- As stated in its scheme documents: • If the units are redeemed / switched out on or before 90 days from the date of allotment – 1.00% • If the units are redeemed / switched out after 90 days from the date of allotment – Nil Check the latest Scheme Information Document before investing, as loads can change.
- What is the difference between the Direct and Regular plans?
- Both plans hold the same portfolio; the Regular plan includes distribution costs in its expense ratio. Over one year the Direct plan's NAV changed by 21.3% and the Regular plan's by 20.3%. The Regular plan includes the services of a distributor.
Every Monday: this scheme's NAV, 1-month and 1-year return beside its category median, 3-year CAGR and how far it is below its peak. Add more schemes from their pages or from your MFIC watchlist. Free; unsubscribe from any email.